Executive Summary:
“If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.” – Thomas Jefferson[1]
The more you learn about the true history of American Civics and Law, the more you'll realize that virtually all of what you see on Television (and about 99.99999999 percent of the Internet) is nothing more than a Puppet Show meant for Infants[2]; SLAVES; the misinformed masses; ya know...people that still wear masks in their cars.
True Patriots have been working diligently for many decades to help eradicate the ignorance that has entrapped the American General Public for more than 160 years. Men and Women like Karl Lentz, Anna Von Reitz and The Living Law Firm, Brent Allan Winters, Angela Stark, Jacquie Figg, Bob Lock, Bill Thornton, Romley Stewart of Australia (Terra Australis[3]), and many more.
The narratives below are just a start to my uninitiated readers' enlightenment - stories that describe the "Justinian Deception" (see the work of Romley Stewart and Brent Allan Winters) forced upon all of our people/People around the World. It's this Justinian Deception; named after Emperor Justinian of the Roman Empire, that remains to be the foundation of the latest 160+ year-old Fraud Scheme used to usurp an unimaginable amount of American Wealth. Your wealth[4].
As you read, ask yourself how many of the Footnoted References herein were taught to you throughout your scholastic career. As you read these references, it is vital that you notice the dates to form the proper context of changes. Note also that; for reasons unknown to me, Olde English Dictionaries use “f” instead of “s” in certain places within a word and, therefore, i replace with “[s]”.
Our actual Country:
Step outside of your Permanent Domicile; your Home. Now look all around you - land, water, skies, animals; the Gold, Silver, Oil, Gemstones and other treasures beneath...All of the Earth...if you were born on or Lawfully Naturalized on to the land called The United States of America[, unincorporated]; it's all yours.
If you're like me, when you first heard this narrative, you thought its author was crazy. Have you ever seen the movie called "Far and Away" with Nicole Kidman and Tom Cruise? Do you recall the parts of the movie that portrayed claiming land by placing a stake in the ground? The actual and factual Law of our Country called The United States of America[, unincorporated] supports this seemingly-fictional narrative much more than the one taught in the "Indoctrination[5] Camps" called "School Districts"[6].
Of course, the foregoing explanation also includes the land rights of the original owners; the so-called "Native Americans" - i believe they may prefer to be called by a different type of Appellation perhaps from their own ancestral writings. i currently have no deep knowledge of the Native Americans' history but i have heard a bit from those whose opinions i trust. And, it has been reported to me that there are Trusts and/or Treaties that exist that have been dishonored by those foreign for-profit CORPORATIONS[7] that have usurped their duties to serve our People[8].
Who and What am "i":
i should probably first inform you; my readers, that my words, language, and grammar should look a bit odd to you. This is because i'm doing my best to use proper English and *not* the gibberish we've been taught all of our lives (hint: THIS IS NON-ENGLISH GIBBERISH as you will discover herein):
- "i" is the symbolism used to depict "man" (head and body) and it’s simply what i choose to use to describe “me”. Thanks to the work of Karl Lentz (also continued by organizations such as "Sovereign's Way"), one reason i choose to use this symbolism is because of the fact that *any* CAPITALIZED WORD translates as "Sign Language" or "Dog Latin". And, if applied to any NAME[9], it is symbolism for the DEAD[10]. It is the language of SLAVES; also known as "Capitas Diminutio Maxima"[11] - or the largest reduction of status. While i could go much deeper into this, you may want to invest in a reference called "Chicago Manual of Style"; 16th Edition[12]. This is just one of hundreds of key points brought forward by Anna Von Reitz and other Lawful man[men and women].
So...first and foremost, i am. Full stop; a creation of my Creator. Simply "man". Besides life, two gifts were provided also by my Mother and my Father: "john", "jesse", and "junior".
"The word 'person' was re-defined from 'people' to 'corporation' ": 37th Congress, Second Session, Chapter 49, Section 68; 1862. - quoting Anna Von Reitz; "Article 58. The specific details of how you were defrauded - by Judge Anna von Reitz, Alaska"
The Centuries-Old Indoctrination of the a Citizenry:
Now, if another man or [wo]man were to read this story, it may very well sound a bit too odd, crazy, and esoteric to them. i do believe, however, that as we all learn and remove the Centuries of Babylonian Indoctrination from our minds, our people will come to comprehend the origins and true nature of our language and Law.
Today, i occupy myself with becoming the best that i can be at comprehending "law" and understanding our “American Common Law”[13]; “The Law of Nature and of Nature's God” as the Great Common Lawyer and author Brent Allan Winters might phrase it.
i have had many teachers during the course of my life but none greater than The Creator; that Ultimate Sovereign Energy that speaks to me from time to time when i most need it. Yes, i used to be an Atheist - a very hard-nosed "Non-Believer" that made fun of those that chose to believe in the Big "Joe Pesci" in the sky (George Carlin fans know what i mean). i had to study The Law, its origins, and compare it to "Statutory Code" - whose beginnings originated from the Titles created by Emperor Justinian for THE STATE (THE ROMAN EMPIRE). Although i won't go into the history too deep, the essence of the story originates from Babylon and the idea that THE STATE (through a Caesar) replaces our Creator; God; Yahweh (whichever appellation is more proper to Biblical Scholars). This idea perpetuates today. Followers of *any* so-called "President" should be very wary of any Corporate/CORPORATE State/STATE leader; Territorial, MUNICIPAL, or any other private foreign for-profit CORPS not grounded in the Biblical/Spiritual foundations of our actual Country.
Now, Anna Von Reitz probably comes a close second to my Creator as a true teacher.
Why?
It's actually pretty simple: As of this writing; i have seen no man, [wo]man or PERSON with the ability to rebut her writings; her claims on the origin and true nature of American Law. If you're reading this and have found contrary Evidence, i would very much appreciate the information you bring forward. However, before doing so, please read and follow this guidance:
Think you know better? Please bring forward your Issue:
For ease of comprehension, please do follow this format when bringing such information forward - first semester [Justinian] law professors call it "I.R.A.C.": Issue, Rule, Argument, and Conclusion:
The "Issue" is a "Yes" or "No"-answered question. E.g. "Whether or Not the Color of the Sky is perceived by us to be Blue?"
The "Rule(s)" or "Law(s)": E.g. The specific Physical Law(s) of Optics that translate the wavelength(s) of light into what our Eyes detect as the Color called "Blue".
The "Argument(s)": E.g. A short paragraph describing the intimate connection between the Issue(s) and the Rule(s) brought forward.
The "Conclusion(s)": E.g. A short paragraph depicting the Conclusion to your Issue; the answer: “Yes” or “No” to the Issue.
Note: Please, no more than one paragraph per section; 12 pt. font and single-spaced 😊
Why is this method so powerful? Because it removes as much false narrative as possible and boils down the issue to its most basic essence. In general, i don't reply to baseless narrative[14] - much of which is found on the typical "Social Media" platform; where brain cells go do die in my opinion. Having used these software-based manipulation systems since AOL Chatrooms complained of “Plumbers” abusing them to suck-up Marketing Data, please know that your “likes” or “Up Votes” may very well come from a call-center full of AI bots or paid foreign for-profit Agents.
The reason i'm here (at least until i find evidence of typical shadow-banning; or other forms of Censorship...):
For the aforementioned reasons and based upon the decades of Anna's Lawful research into our American Civics and Law; including that of The Living Law Firm, and for my own selfish purposes which will become evident as you read more of my story, i became what is known as The Jural Assembly Committee Chairman of The Colorado General Assembly under The Federation of States[15] - a role i volunteered to have for many years now.
Before anyone gets twisted in the knots of their own CORPORATE-indoctrinated belief-system, no - a "Chairman" is *not* defined herein as some sort of "Leader"; in a CORPORATE sense. My function is limited to that of a "Spokesman" for our people; and "We, the People", on Colorado. Ours is a Republican form of Government[16]; not a so-called "Democracy".
Sidenote: Please do not confuse the actions of some to be at the direction of Anna, myself, or other knowledgeable members of any particular Lawful Assembly. As noted below, some willfully ignore decades of research for whatever latest YouTube “guru” that publishes their narrative – typically requiring an unconscionable contract with a DeFacto CORPORATE entity. Hint: When they ask you to “…simply fill-out this IRS Form and Sign it…” or “Here’s a ‘template’ you can use…”, run away… as fast as you can.[17]
An additional and important side note: There are other "Jural Assemblies" out there. But, there is only one on each State authorized by The Federation of States; a living Body Politic of people; men and women that provide guidance on the proper[18] and Lawful Reconstruction of the States of The United States of America(unincorporated).
Confusion - both real and MANUFACTURED:
As the saying goes, "If you're getting a lot of flack, you know you're directly over the target."
Now, please realize what the information you're being provided is all about...it's about Lawfully removing YOU from a SLAVERY system. It's about removing all of the extra "Wealth" (your Energy) from your SLAVE-MASTERS:
Notice to all "Law Enforcement" (aka LEOs): Both in my own family and previous relationships, i have spent a great deal of time with LEOs. Please know that you are respected for everything you do to "Lawfully" protect Americans. However, you should also realize that you're being cheated out of your American inheritance-just like all other U.S. Citizens and citizens of the United States[19]. The last LEO i had a relationship with did not make much money for the hours she put-in for the inherently dangerous job she had to do. So, the next time you encounter a man or a woman Lawfully identifying him or herself as an "American State National", a "State Citizen", a "Foreign Sovereign", or simply "man"/"woman"; please listen to them carefully before trespassing upon their private property[20].
Do you honestly think those SLAVE-MASTERS are simply going to be like: “Darn, the Citizens are awake…we need to pack our bags and leave.”
"Real Confusion" is what happens when a U.S. citizen first realizes that they actually have a choice of "Political Status"; many of them listed in the FEDERAL CODE known as 8 USC [section] 1101; notwithstanding the fact that these do not directly apply to peaceful living Americans; Foreign Sovereigns relative to the United States, Inc.[21] The confusion eventually gets cleared-up as they a) read old law dictionaries from the 1700's though the 1800's[22], b) do their own due diligence by researching our Lawful history (e.g. United States Supreme Court Case: Ex Parte Milligan (1866)[23]), and c) Testing what they've learned to be true in the Real World and in their daily lives.
"MANUFACTURED Confusion" is what happens when a "legal PERSON" shows that THEY are feigning confusion with illogical narrative and are obviously paid or coerced to do so by their Territorial, MUNICIPAL, or other Foreign Employers. The more well-read a man is about American Civics, The Laws of England from which our Common Law foundations come, and our Geneva Bible; or that closest to the originating Biblical text; the better his or her lens through which they may discern what is true.
Having dealt with many different personalities over the last few years, in my opinion this type of Confusion mainly comes from people that want the information described herein to be "Spoon-fed" to them or to be provided with "Templates" (these crutches *do not* help them really learn what they need to know to defend themselves and their families from trespass). people like:
- Followers of David Lester Straight (DLS):
Many "gurus" out on the Inter-web exist only to distract the aforementioned people from achieving their proper Political Status. Why do i believe this? Because i have been taught how to read certain "LEGALISE", "English", and those words associated with different law forms like "Equity law (Commercial law)".
Is the existence of these detractors by accident or on-purpose?
First, the name "David L. Straight" was unknown to me during a time when i had to research "Child Trafficking"; a phenomenon i was intimately familiar with long prior to the Election of Donald J. Trump. Second, after years of watching this man pronounce himself as "close to President Trump" and part of the whole so-called "Anti-Pedophile Task Force"; along with other entertaining narratives, the man known as TIMOTHY CHARLES HOLMSETH (TCH); a reporter famous for disclosing the true nature of “Crimes against humanity” within our Country and elsewhere (TIMOTHYCHARLESHOLMSETH.COM) has brought forward very credible evidence of David L. Straight's involvement in *protecting* Child Traffickers and Pedophiles - and perhaps even more serious allegations.
Very curiously, David has yet to sue Timothy Charles Holmseth for Defamation and/or Slander, an action any logical-thinking man would expect if the allegations made were false.
So, if even a fraction of TCH’s published blogs describing D.L.S. are proven to be true, like: “HOW GEN. FLYNN, DAVID STRAIGHT, and ATTORNEY LIN WOOD CLEVERLY USED THE FBI IN AN ATTEMPTED COUP”, then it would make perfect sense to me that “David Straight is trying to help people to…adopt British Territorial United States (U.S.) Citizenship…to adopt Dual Citizenship/Nationality…[as an] ‘American State National’ … as used in Federal Code [which] only applies to American Samoans.” - quoting Anna’s Article 4346. Double Meanings for Different Things
Now, i am not a follower of men but of ideas. TCH seems to bash what he calls the "American State National movement" by associating it with David - an ignorant decision on Timothy's part.
- Men that; maybe rightfully so, believe that because they know to be Creations of the Creator; there is nothing they should do beyond acting as "man" (an idea originating from Karl Lentz to the best of my knowledge):
While there would be very little argument from me with the fundamental beliefs that these men have, these men probably still exist in the DMV, VOTER, and IRS databases - men that, however mistakenly so, placed themselves under U.S.[, Inc.] Commercial Contracts (see e.g. US[, INC.] Code [28 [section]1605 (a)(2)]). Of course i believe in what they do in that these Commercial Contracts naturally do not apply to them; not to mention that they are unconscionable agreements. However, this is not the fundamental issue: the issue is whether or not U.S., INC. will "recognize"[24] their inherent Sovereignty. Experience tells me THEY won't...generally speaking – but, if you comprehend the meaning of that word, why care?
To be clear, i am not saying that these methods do not ever work; but i am saying that in order for them to work, these men need to be well-informed and well-spoken when attempting to defend their position.
Sidenote: i recently visited with a man of faith with similar ideas: There is a reason that our Assembly uses the 1599 Geneva Bible; as opposed to the King James version. This man was chastised for “marrying outside of ‘his tribe’”; seemingly to mean the “tribe of Israel”. Now, i am *not* a Biblical scholar, but those that are well-read in Biblical text tell me that the “tribe” discussed in the 1599 Geneva Bible is *not* the same Israel lineage discussed on Tell-A-Vision. i will leave this debate for those well-educated in our Theology.
- So-called "Constitutionalists":
These men belong to the category of those that still believe that "the Constitution" is some kind of magical document. Don't get me wrong, The Constitution for the United States of America is a geniusly-written Lawful instrument. However, it is what it is: A Compact; a type of Contract; a Lawful instrument created *by the People* in order to create our Lawful Government - and to limit this Government's Power. It *is not* an instrument meant to define the unalienable rights of "We, the People"; a Body Politic of man. They must start to realize that God (or whatever you call your Creator) created "man" and then man created a [living] "Body Politic" called "people" and then those people Elected our "People" (as in "We, the People") to define each "State” (as in "State of the Union"). Hence, without man; there is no State of the Union. Put simply, The Creator is not commanded by the Created. That said, anyone attempting to enforce "rights" under any "Constitution" unknowingly place themselves in the position of "the Created" - a.k.a. SLAVES under the 14th Amendment; an Amendment that was *never* Lawfully ratified by the States of the Union[25].
Many of these types tell me something like: "But john, isn't it best to understand their Federal Code?". To me, this translates to, "But john, isn't it best to understand the 'Manual on How to create a Hamburger' when we order a Hamburger Shop Combo Meal? The answer, of course, is "No". Our Government; and any "Sub-Contractor", was created to serve We, the People. Full Stop. We simply order "Services" and expect to have those services completed Lawfully, correctly, and in a timely manner. And, as far as i am aware, the 2012 version of Title 50; Appendix Sections 7(c) and 7(e) and certain Public Law on the Federal Record (not “Registry”) apply to the American People.
- "Equity law" practitioners:
Some men mistakenly think that "The Law of Kinds" may be ignored. Can man reply to the CIVILLY-DEAD? As Anna says: "Equity law" is a bastardization of Common Law with Admiralty law. Some of these "gurus" actually try to convince the under-educated that "...the United States removed access to 'COMMON LAW' ". To which i typically reply "So, your LEGISLATURE has the ability to pass a law that prevents a falling pebble from ever touching the ground?". Now, of course, Equity law has its place; and can be very effective...when dealing with the DEAD. But, for Heaven's sake, these Avatar-hidden Souls should stop perpetuating their "There is no Common Law" narratives inside of any Super-Secret Chat App echo-chambers. [Hint: YOUR GOVERNMENT knows who you are and is monitoring you 24/7. And, your methods haven't kept even the most "educated" of you from serious trouble.]
· The :THIS-IS-MY-NEW: LANGUAGE:: Commander Gould (Russel J.) PARSE-SYNTAX Proponents:
While Russel may be a "genius" and also may seem to be a fundamentally good man, the use of PARSE-SYNTAX LANGUAGE in an attempt to [Re-]create Lawful Contracts or to [Re-]interpret our Foundational instruments has some logical flaws associated with it (notwithstanding the fact that PARSE-SYNTAX GRAMMAR may have a place in the future): a) If one bothers to research the "opinions" of the U.S. Supreme Court, they opined that an instrument is to be interpreted by the definitions of the words used to create that instrument at the time of its creation. Therefore, b) by attempting to recreate or reinterpret such Lawful instruments, the agreement may be voided for all parties - thereby nullifying any benefit our Founding Fathers fought so hard for.
Final Note:
To the chagrin of my Father, i am not a "follower" of men but of ideas. As stated above, Anna Von Reitz is a Great Woman. i do believe that her work will go down in our history books as some of the most important and treasured works of our time. However, i do not "follow her" like a mindless minion. i have heard from our Assembly Members too many times: "But, Anna said..." or "Did your read Anna's latest article..." to which i typically respond: "Did you actually research the information that Anna put forward?" or something similar. Anna, herself, has reminded people many times not to take her opinions for granted but to dig deep into them and to carefully research her work - which i attempt to do almost every day...for the past 8 years or so.
More specifically, Anna did not teach me "how" to do what i do. What Anna did is put forward the vital information necessary to enable me to comprehend the "what" and the "why" of real-world historical events; through her well-researched and yet-to-be Lawfully rebutted American Civics and Law teachings.
Again, if you believe that you know better, submit your issue - may our Lord Bless and Keep you and yours in His Grace for all time.
by: john j. bautista, jr.©;
All rights reserved without Prejudice.
[1] quoting p. 270; Disclosure 101 by: David E. Robinson FOR Anna Von Reitz; Edition 07/04/14. (Notice: All quoted Anna Articles may be found at AnnaVonReitz.Com and Searched for on SearchAnnaVonReitz.Com.)
[2] Re: Infants: “ … Under Statutes and Policies promulgated from Westminster and other bodies, a Birth Certificate fulfills multiple and distinct functions and states … ‘Certificate of Bondage as Slave being the certificate as recognition of a man or woman born as a member of the poor,…, the infants, the idiots and lunatics,…, the humans, …, the insolvent debtors and criminals and enemies of those who have created wholly mythical religious and legal texts to justify their exclusive positions as masters of a planet of slaves.” – quoting Anna’s Article 863. An Education on the Birth Certificate from Frank O’Collins.
[3] Like The United States of America (major) (a.k.a. The united State of America[, unincorporated]); our Actual and Factual Country, Terra Australis is the Actual and Factual Country of the People of AUSTRALIA, INC. – People being similarly defrauded of their wealth.
[4] By “Your wealth”, i am referring to; among other sources, your Energy; your Hard Work and the Work of the Generations of your American Family that came before you: All kept in Trust and allegedly managed “for you” and your progeny by “the VATICAN”; as you and your American Families are the beneficiaries of The United States Trust of 1789.
[5] Re: “Indoctrination”: “The powers-that-be had forced the translators of the Geneva Bible into exile from England because they resisted that Babylonian, civil-canon law doctrine then afoot in England, Wales, Ireland, and Scotland, called the divine-right-of-kings; by contrast, King James I. required the translators of the King James Bible to swear that they supported his commitment to that civil-canon law doctrine called the divine-right-of-kings. Thus do each of these two translations bring to bear massive learning, deft articulation, and uncanny passion-in a word adversity-over this single controlling question of man’s life: the law of the land (our [American] common law) versus the law of the city (the civil law), the real case and controversy that carried to the New World and out of which throes the United States has been birthed.” – quoting “Volume I Genesis-1st Kings, The Good Book, Uncooked,,A Common Lawyer,,,-Translates-,,From the Original, Tongues & Annotates,Brent Allan Winters” “1a—CL Bible”.
[6] "DISTRICT...a particular Territory the Bounds or Extent of a Jurisdiction a Province. (TERRITORY...a certain Compa[s]s of Land, lying within the Bounds, or belonging to the Jurisdiction of any State, City, etc."; "To COMPASS...to contrive, to plot, or to endeavor; al[s]o to effect; al[so] to environ, to [s]urround."; COMPASS...a Thing on all Sides, or round about.) For educational purposes, compare with "CONTINENT [in Geography] is a great Extent of Land, which comprehends [s]everal Regions and Kingdoms which are not [s]eparated by Sea." - quoting An Univer[s]al Etymological ENGLISH DICTIONARY; COMPREHENDING The Derivations of the Generality of Words in the Engli[s]h Tongue...; (1675)
[7] “CORPORATION, a Political Body or Company, established by a Royal Charter [compare with CORPSE…a dead Body or Carca[s]e.] - quoting An Univer[s]al Etymological ENGLISH DICTIONARY; COMPREHENDING The Derivations of the Generality of Words in the Engli[s]h Tongue...; (1675); “CORPORATION,…Chief Justice Marshall describes a corporation to be ‘an artificial being, invisible, intangible, and existing only in contemplation of law. Being a mere creature of law,’ continues the judge, ‘it possesses only those properties which the character of its creation confers upon it…’…Private corporations. …if the whole interest does not belong to the government [of, for, and by the People],…the corporation is private. A bank, for instance, may be created…but if the stock is owned by private persons, it is a private corporation…[e.g. Civil [of the Babylonian Roman Empire CITY – see Excellence of the Common Law by: Brent Winters] corporations]. – quoting Bouvier Law Dictionary (1862) by: John Bouvier.
[8] "PEOPLE...the whole Body of Per[s]ons who...make up a Nation" - quoting An Univer[s]al Etymological ENGLISH DICTIONARY; COMPREHENDING The Derivations of the Generality of Words in the Engli[s]h Tongue...; (1675)
[9] "NAME. The designation of an individual person, or of a firm or corporation." - quoting BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY; 4th Edition; 1968.
[10] “CIVIL Death, is when, by being [s]entensed to perpetual Bani[s]hment, a Per[s]on is cut off from Civil Society, to working in the Mines, or to the Gallies.” - quoting An Univer[s]al Etymological ENGLISH DICTIONARY; COMPREHENDING The Derivations of the Generality of Words in the Engli[s]h Tongue...; (1675); CIVIL DEATH, persons. The change of the state…of a person who is declared civilly dead by judgment of a competent tribunal. In such case, the person against whom sentence is pronounced is considered dead. – quoting Bouvier (1862). (“COMPETENCY, evidence. … 2. Prima facie every person offered is a competent witness, and must be received, unless his incompetency…appears…5. In the French law, by competency is understood the right in a court to exercise jurisdiction in a particular case; …”) – quoting Bouvier (1862) [Hint: Do foreign for-profit CORPORATIONS; CIVILLY-DEAD entities, have “jurisdiction” over the living? And, what is “Jurisdiction”?]
[11] Re: "CAPITIS DIMINUTIO MAXIMA": a) "ESTIMATIO CAPITIS. Lat. The value of a head. In Saxon law, the estimation or valuation of the head; the price or value of a man. The price to be paid for taking the life of a human being. By the laws of Athelstan, the life of every man not excepting that of the king himself, was estimated at a certain price, which was called the were, or cestimatio capitis." b) "DEMINUTIO. In the civil law. A taking away; loss or deprivation. See Capitis Deminutio." c) "CAPITIS DIMINUTIO MAXIMA. The highest or most comprehensive loss of status. This occurred when a man's condition was changed from one of freedom to one of bondage, when he became a slave. It swept away with it all rights of citizenship and family rights." - quoting BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY; 4th Edition; 1968.
[12] Glosses in ASL [American Sign Language]: "The written-language transcription of a sign is called a gloss. Glosses are words from the spoken language written ...[as] WOMAN, SCHOOL, CAT ... regular capital letters may be used..." - quoting p. 576; 11.147; The Chicago Manual of Style; 16th Edition.
[13] Because there are a ‘Gazillion’ deliberately-confusing (i would go as far to say “wrong”) interpretations of “COMMON LAW”/”common law”/”Common Law” inside of various “law dictionaries” out there, “We, the People” tend to use the term “American Common Law”; the history of which is described, generally, in Excellence of the Common Law; by: Brent Winters; a book based, in large part, upon Blackstone’s Commentaries on the laws of England (1765) and The Geneva Bible (1599).
[14] Maxim of law: “Silence is acquiescence when there is a duty to respond.” (“DUTY, natural law. …3. Duties may be considered in the relation of man towards God, towards himself, and towards mankind…man…has duties to perform towards others. He is bound to do to others the same justice which he would have a right to expect them to do to him.”). – quoting Bouvier (1862).
[15] "State: What is a "state"?: "People: A state;...A nation in its collective and political capacity..." quoting p. 649; Bouvier law dictionary. (See also 1856 Bouvier law dictionary online at https//1215.org/lawnotes/bouvier/bouvier_p.htm - Bill Thornton's Website)
[16] “Within our States of the Union, we have a ‘republican form of government’ that honors and protects the individual rights and prerogatives and assets of each one of us. We all have an equal say and equal protection under the law. … It breaks my heart to hear Americans mindlessly cheerleading for ‘their’ democracy, when they don’t know what a democracy is, and don’t realize that they are cheering for a foreign government.” – quoting Article entitled: No Theocracy. No Democracy. Just Republics. (see SearchAnnaVonReitz.Com)
[17] Re: Templates: From my perspective, they can be a teaching tool, however; study our Public Law, our American Common Law, and American Civics and you can create your own Lawful Instruments…no need for others to tell you what to write.
[18] Please note that the Political Status Correction process that Anna Von Reitz and The Living Law Firm put forward was *not* “created” but “found”. You can discern the differences between the paperwork that each State Recording Secretary; under The Federation of States, provides than those of other “ASN” organizations.
[19] “1967 – Congressional Record , June 13, 1967, pp. 15641-15646: A ‘citizen of the United States’ is a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT, the private constructive, cestui que trust of US Inc. under the 14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US Inc. in Section 4.” – quoting Anna’s Article entitled Formal Notice to Congress Regarding Fraud – 22 April, 2016.
[20] LEO history originates; in large part; from foreign-hired Pinkertons operating on our Soil: “Remember that there has been an absolutely horrific and fully intentional preparation for war that has been made on our shores. Remember that the Alphabet Soup Agencies have been armed to the teeth. The Pinkerton-for-hire LEO organizations have been militarized and fed a bunch of Bushwah about ‘sovereign citizens’ being the enemy.” – quoting Anna’s Article 2205. More Light on the Virginia Gun Grab [Hint: there is no such entity called a ‘sovereign citizen’ that exists in our Law history – but for this “Boogy-man” made-up ostensibly by the British Accreditation Registry (B.A.R.) and their Pay-Masters; and the published threadbare narrative in voluminous tome like “The Anti-Government Movement Guidebook” by The National Center for State Courts; 1999 – conspicuously devoid of Lawful word definition and the enactment clauses required in all Public Law].
[21] “The only reason that a member of our General Public [as opposed to e.g. PUBLIC[,INC] as styled on a typical STATE OF ______ or COUNTY OF ________ Traffic Ticket] would have to reference Federal Code is to convince Public Employees that they are in violation of their own Code, and if that is what you are doing, you must make that very explicit. … Estimates are that 92-95 % of all Federal Code has no application related to Joe Average American…” – quoting Anna’s Article 4346. Double Meanings for Different Things
[22] “[Footnote]66 … Although statutory and constitutional interpretation are often considered distinct endeavors, the Court has generally not made any distinction in its use of dictionaries for the two types of cases. [However] … For the most part, [the United States Supreme Court] have cited old dictionaries to demonstrate the meaning of constitutional language at the time it was drafted.” – see the following link from 1215.org (https://werbach.com/stuff/hlr_note.html).
[23] Basically, Ex Parte Milligan says that a Native-born American is *not* an "Enemy Combatant" in relation to the DeFacto "Carpetbagger Court" system. Hence, all Territorial and MUNICIPAL Courts are 1) Military Tribunals and 2) Foreign to Native-born and Lawfully Naturalized Americans. We, Americans, are Lawfully described as "Foreign Sovereigns" (e.g. see also your "Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act").
[24] Re: Recognize: “RECOGNIZANCE, contracts. An obligation of record, entered into before a court or officer duly authorized for that purpose, with a condition to do some act required by law, which is therein specified…2. Recognizances relate either to criminal or civil matters. 1. Recognizes in criminal cases, are either that the party shall appear before the proper court to answer to such charges as are or shall be made against him, that he shall keep the peace or be of good behaviour. Witnesses are also required to be bound in a recognizance to testify. 3.—2. In civil cases, recognizances are entered into by bail, conditioned that they will pay the debt, interest and costs recovered by the plaintiff under certain contingencies. There are cases where recognizances are entered into under the authority and requirements of statutes.” – Bouvier (1862) [Hint: Outside of The Constitution of 1787, what contract does any COURT[, INC.] have with our People?]
[25] “I, Christopher M. Davidson, J.D., Director of The Georgia Archives, do hereby certify that the three (3) page document hereto attached and made part of this certificate is a true and correct copy of the entire file for Act No. 45 (SR 39), approved March 8, 1957, “A memorial to the Congress of the United States of America urging them to enact such legislation as they deem fit to declare that the 14th and 15th amendments to the Constitution of the United States were never validly adopted…” – quoting same STATE OF GEORGIA record cover-page as described.